Service Animals and Emotional Support Animals in the Workplace
Table of Contents

Understanding the distinctions between service animals and emotional support animals has become increasingly important for both employers and employees. These animals play significant but legally distinct roles in supporting individuals with disabilities, and navigating these distinctions properly is essential for workplace compliance and inclusion. At Nisar Law Group, we regularly advise employers on developing appropriate animal policies and represent employees whose animal accommodation requests have been improperly handled.

This guide explains the legal framework governing both service animals and emotional support animals in employment settings, outlining the rights and responsibilities for all parties involved.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for legal advice. It is essential to consult with an experienced employment lawyer at our law firm to discuss the specific facts of your case and understand your legal rights and options. This information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Understanding Key Definitions and Legal Distinctions

The distinction between service animals and emotional support animals isn’t just semantic—it carries significant legal implications that affect accommodation requirements in the workplace.

Service Animals

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), service animals are specifically defined as dogs (and in limited circumstances, miniature horses) that are individually trained to perform specific tasks or work directly related to an individual’s disability. These tasks must directly address limitations caused by the disability and go beyond providing comfort or emotional support.

Examples of service animal tasks include:

  • Guiding people who are blind
  • Alerting people who are deaf
  • Pulling a wheelchair
  • Alerting and protecting a person having a seizure
  • Reminding a person with mental illness to take prescribed medications
  • Calming a person with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder during an anxiety attack

Importantly, the task training element creates a clear distinction between service animals and other supportive animals. The training must be specific to the handler’s disability, though no formal certification, professional training, or documentation is legally required under federal law. The animal must also be under the handler’s control and housebroken.

Emotional Support Animals

Emotional support animals (ESAs), therapy animals, and comfort animals are not considered service animals under the ADA because they haven’t been trained to perform specific disability-related tasks. These animals provide companionship, relieve loneliness, and sometimes help with anxiety, depression, or certain phobias, but their supportive presence alone doesn’t qualify them as service animals under federal law.

While emotional support animals have protected status in housing under the Fair Housing Act and historically had accommodations in air travel (though this has changed under recent Department of Transportation rules), they don’t receive the same automatic accommodations in workplaces under the ADA. This doesn’t mean they can never be permitted as workplace accommodations—but they fall under different legal standards, as we’ll explore.

Legal Framework for Animals in the Workplace

Several laws may govern animals in employment settings, creating a complex landscape of requirements and considerations.

Service Animals Under the ADA

Title I of the ADA, which covers employment, differs from Titles II and III (covering government services and public accommodations) in its approach to service animals. While Titles II and III contain specific service animal provisions, Title I addresses service animals within its general reasonable accommodation framework.

This means that service animals in workplaces are handled through the same interactive process used for other accommodation requests, rather than through the more automatic access granted in public accommodations. However, given their defined status under the ADA, properly trained service animals will typically qualify as reasonable accommodations unless the employer can demonstrate:

  • The animal poses a direct threat to health or safety that cannot be mitigated
  • The animal fundamentally alters the nature of the business
  • The accommodation would impose an undue hardship

These exceptions are interpreted narrowly, and employers bear the burden of demonstrating that they apply in specific circumstances.

Emotional Support Animals as Potential Accommodations

While emotional support animals don’t have the same defined status as service animals under the ADA, they may still qualify as reasonable accommodations in certain circumstances. The key legal analysis involves:

  1. Whether the employee has a disability as defined by the ADA
  2. Whether the animal helps mitigate the effects of that disability
  3. Whether allowing the animal would be reasonable within the workplace context
  4. Whether the accommodation would pose an undue hardship

Courts have reached different conclusions about emotional support animals as workplace accommodations, often focusing on the connection between the animal’s presence and the employee’s ability to perform essential job functions. Some courts have found that emotional support animals that help mitigate symptoms of psychiatric disabilities may qualify as reasonable accommodations when supported by appropriate documentation.

State and Local Laws

Several states and municipalities have enacted laws that expand protection for service animals or provide additional recognition for emotional support animals. These laws may:

  • Broaden the definition of service animals beyond dogs and miniature horses
  • Establish certification or licensing systems for service animals
  • Create specific protections for emotional support animals
  • Prohibit misrepresentation of pets as service or support animals
  • Establish penalties for discrimination against service animal handlers

Employers must comply with whichever law—federal, state, or local—provides the greatest protection to individuals with disabilities. This creates a patchwork of requirements that varies by location and requires location-specific compliance strategies.

Handling Service Animal Requests in the Workplace

When an employee requests to bring a service animal to work, employers should follow these best practices to ensure both legal compliance and practical success.

The Interactive Process for Service Animals

Service animal accommodation requests should trigger the same interactive process used for other disability accommodations:

  1. Engage promptly upon request: When an employee requests to use a service animal, engage in a timely, good-faith dialogue about the accommodation.

  2. Focus on appropriate inquiries: For service animals, employers may ask only two questions:
    • Is the animal required because of a disability?
    • What work or tasks has the animal been trained to perform?
  3. Employers should not ask about the person’s disability, require medical documentation, demand demonstrations of the animal’s abilities, or require formal certification of the animal.

  4. Assess workplace impact: Consider how the service animal will function in the specific workplace environment, including:
    • Physical space requirements
    • Interaction with other employees
    • Potential impact on operations
    • Health and safety considerations
  5. Explore solutions for concerns: If legitimate workplace challenges arise, explore options that would allow the service animal while addressing concerns, such as:
    • Adjusting the employee’s workstation location
    • Creating designated relief areas
    • Establishing boundaries for the animal’s movement
    • Providing education to coworkers
  6. Document the agreement: Clearly document the accommodation plan, including:
    • Where the animal may go within the workplace
    • Care and control expectations
    • Procedures for addressing any issues that arise
    • Follow-up timeline to assess effectiveness
  7. Monitor and adjust: Periodically check in to ensure the accommodation is working effectively for everyone involved, making adjustments as needed.

Common Workplace Concerns and Solutions

Several concerns typically arise with service animals in workplaces. Here are effective approaches to addressing them:

Allergies and phobias: When another employee has allergies or fears, employers should seek solutions that accommodate both employees, such as:

  • Creating distance between workstations
  • Installing air purifiers
  • Establishing different work schedules
  • Using different paths of travel
  • Offering telework options for either employee

Customer or client concerns: In customer-facing positions, employers should generally prioritize the employee’s right to use their service animal while educating customers or clients about service animal laws.

Food service environments: Health codes generally provide exceptions for service animals, though they may be restricted from certain food preparation areas. Alternative accommodation might include reassignment to non-food preparation areas.

Sterile environments: In healthcare or clean manufacturing environments, accommodations might include protective gear for the animal or reassignment to areas where sterility is less critical, depending on the specific requirements.

Animal behavior issues: If a service animal becomes disruptive or uncontrolled, the employer may require its removal until the behavior is addressed. However, the employee should be permitted to remain and continue working.

Emotional Support Animals as Workplace Accommodations

Handling emotional support animal requests requires a somewhat different approach, focusing more on medical documentation and the connection between the animal and job performance.

Documentation for Emotional Support Animals

Unlike with service animals, employers may request documentation for emotional support animal accommodation requests, including:

  • Verification of the employee’s disability from a healthcare provider
  • Explanation of how the animal helps mitigate disability-related limitations
  • Information about how the animal’s presence relates to job performance
  • Details about the animal’s training, behavior, and care requirements

This documentation helps establish whether the emotional support animal constitutes a reasonable accommodation under the ADA’s framework.

Evaluating Reasonableness and Undue Hardship

When assessing emotional support animal requests, employers should consider:

Connection to essential job functions: How does the animal’s presence enable the employee to perform essential job duties? For example, an emotional support animal that helps mitigate anxiety might enable an employee to interact effectively with colleagues or customers.

Workplace impact: What practical effects would the animal’s presence have on operations, safety, and other employees? This assessment should be based on objective information rather than assumptions or stereotypes.

Available alternatives: Are there other effective accommodations that might address the disability-related limitations with less workplace impact? While employers may choose the less disruptive of equally effective accommodations, they should carefully consider the employee’s preference for using an emotional support animal.

Mitigation strategies: Could any concerns be addressed through limitations on where the animal may go, specific animal behavior requirements, or other parameters?

Employers should document their analysis of these factors, particularly if they determine that an emotional support animal would create an undue hardship.

Implementing Successful Emotional Support Animal Accommodations

When approving emotional support animals in the workplace, clear parameters help ensure success:

Animal behavior standards: Establish expectations that the animal must be:

  • Under control at all times
  • Housebroken
  • Non-disruptive
  • Well-groomed
  • Free from diseases or parasites

Handler responsibilities: Clarify that the employee must:

  • Maintain control of the animal
  • Care for the animal’s needs during the workday
  • Address any behavior issues promptly
  • Clean up after the animal
  • Maintain appropriate liability insurance if required

Workplace limitations: Define where the animal may go and any restricted areas based on legitimate business needs.

Resolution process: Establish procedures for addressing any issues or concerns that arise after implementation.

These parameters should be applied consistently while allowing for individual assessment of each accommodation request.

Addressing Coworker Concerns

Other employees may respond with curiosity, concern, or even resistance to animals in the workplace. Employers can manage these reactions effectively through:

Education: Provide general information about service and support animals, accommodation requirements, and disability etiquette without disclosing the specific employee’s disability details.

Clear guidelines: Establish and communicate how colleagues should interact with the animal, emphasizing that service animals are working and should not be pet, fed, or distracted without the handler’s permission.

Addressing legitimate concerns: Take seriously issues like allergies or phobias, working to find solutions that accommodate all employees’ needs without requiring the removal of a necessary service or support animal.

Confidentiality: Maintain appropriate confidentiality about the employee’s disability and accommodation details while still providing necessary information to affected coworkers.

Mediation: If conflicts arise, provide neutral mediation to find workable solutions that respect everyone’s needs and rights.

When handled thoughtfully, the introduction of an animal into the workplace can actually enhance the work environment, potentially improving morale and promoting greater disability awareness.

Policy Development for Employers

Developing clear policies regarding service and support animals helps ensure consistent handling of accommodation requests and prevents discrimination. Effective policies should include:

Definitions and distinctions: Clearly explain the differences between service animals and emotional support animals, using legally accurate definitions.

Request procedures: Outline how employees should request animal accommodations, whom to contact, and what information may be required.

Documentation guidelines: Specify what documentation may be requested for different types of animals, being careful to follow ADA limitations for service animals.

Decision-making process: Explain how requests will be evaluated, including the interactive process and criteria for determining reasonableness.

Workplace guidelines: Establish general expectations for animal behavior, handler responsibilities, and colleagues’ interactions with the animal.

Dispute resolution: Create procedures for addressing concerns or conflicts that arise after an animal accommodation is implemented.

Training requirements: Ensure that managers, HR personnel, and other employees receive appropriate training on the policy and relevant legal requirements.

Importantly, policies should maintain flexibility for individual assessment rather than creating rigid rules that might fail to accommodate unique circumstances.

Best Practices for Employees Requesting Animal Accommodations

Employees seeking to use service or emotional support animals in the workplace can strengthen their requests by following these guidelines:

Understand the legal distinctions: Recognize the different legal standards for service animals versus emotional support animals, and frame your request appropriately.

Make clear, specific requests: Explicitly request the accommodation, explaining the type of animal and how it assists with disability-related limitations.

Provide appropriate documentation: For service animals, be prepared to explain the tasks the animal performs. For emotional support animals, obtain healthcare provider documentation connecting the animal to your disability and job performance.

Propose solutions proactively: Suggest ways your animal can be accommodated with minimal workplace disruption, such as specific care arrangements or workstation considerations.

Maintain professional standards: Ensure your animal is well-behaved, clean, and properly controlled at all times, maintaining the same professional standards you would in any other aspect of your job.

Address issues promptly: If any concerns arise about your animal’s behavior or impact, address them immediately and constructively.

Know your rights and limitations: Understand both what you’re entitled to under the law and what legitimate limitations employers may impose based on workplace requirements.

By approaching the accommodation process collaboratively and responsibly, employees increase the likelihood of successful integration of their animal into the workplace.

Recent Legal Developments and Emerging Trends

The legal landscape surrounding service and support animals continues to evolve, with several notable trends:

Increasing sophistication of service animals: As service animals are trained for an expanding range of disabilities, including psychiatric conditions like PTSD, anxiety disorders, and autism, employers should stay informed about these developments.

Psychiatric service animals: Courts increasingly recognize the distinction between emotional support animals and psychiatric service animals that perform specific tasks related to mental health disabilities.

State law expansions: More states are enacting laws that provide greater protection for both service and support animals, sometimes extending beyond federal requirements.

Fraudulent service animal concerns: Growing concerns about misrepresentation of pets as service animals have led to stricter penalties in some jurisdictions and greater scrutiny of accommodation requests.

Remote work considerations: The expansion of remote work creates new questions about accommodation requirements when employees work from home but occasionally visit office locations.

Post-pandemic workplace returns: As employees return to workplaces after becoming accustomed to having pets at home during pandemic-related remote work, employers face increasing requests for animal accommodations.

Organizations should stay current on these developments to ensure their policies and practices remain legally compliant and effective.

Conclusion: Creating Animal-Inclusive Workplaces

When implemented thoughtfully, accommodations for service and support animals can contribute to productive, inclusive workplaces where employees with disabilities can fully contribute their talents and skills. Successful implementation requires:

  • Clear understanding of the legal distinctions between animal types
  • Individualized assessment of each accommodation request
  • Good-faith engagement in the interactive process
  • Practical solutions to legitimate workplace concerns
  • Ongoing communication and adjustment

At Nisar Law Group, we help both employers developing animal accommodation policies and employees navigating the accommodation request process. Whether you’re seeking to implement an effective animal policy or facing challenges with an accommodation request, our experienced attorneys can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation.

By approaching animal accommodations with knowledge, flexibility, and commitment to both legal compliance and practical workplace functioning, organizations can successfully integrate necessary service and support animals while maintaining productive work environments for all employees.

Related Resources

At Nisar Law Group, P.C., our New York lawyers are prepared to help hold your employer accountable for mistreatment directed at you. Please call us at or contact us online to discuss your case.

Written by Mahir S. Nisar

Mahir S. Nisar is the Principal at the Nisar Law Group, P.C., a boutique employment litigation firm dedicated to representing employees who have experienced discrimination within the workplace. Mr. Nisar has developed a stellar reputation for effectively advocating for his clients through his many years of practice as a civil litigator. Mr. Nisar’s passion in helping people overcome adversity in life and in their livelihood led him to train himself as a life coach with the Institute of Life Coach Training (ILCT). He routinely provides life coaching and executive coaching services to his existing clients as they collectively navigate the challenges of the legal process.