In the wake of the #MeToo movement, many women have taken steps to confront and address sexual harassment in the workplace. This has led to some concerns about men facing false or unsubstantiated allegations that may negatively affect their careers. In some cases, some employees have gone to court in an effort to clear their names and fight back against what they perceive as illegal gender discrimination targeting men.
Judge Rejects Ex-Hofstra Coach's Lawsuit Over Sexual Harassment Allegations
It is important to understand that such claims are not inherently without merit. Employment discrimination laws protect men and women equally. So, an employer that maintains policies or practices that put men or a subset of men–such as white men–at a disadvantage with respect to employment could be held liable under state or federal law.
At the same time, a man can not simply stand up and cry “discrimination” just because he was disciplined or fired by a female boss. Even in cases in which a man believes he was unfairly terminated following an allegation of sexual harassment against him, a judge still needs to see hard evidence of sex-based discrimination. In other words, a man must still prove he was fired because he was a man, not for some other, legitimate reason.
This brings us to a recent decision by a Brooklyn federal judge in the case of Menaker v. Hofstra University. The plaintiff in this case previously worked as a men's and women's tennis coach for Hofstra University. Four months into the plaintiff's tenure, a dispute arose between the plaintiff and one of his first-year players over her scholarship. According to the plaintiff, the player claimed she was promised an increase in her scholarship by the plaintiff's predecessor. The plaintiff said he investigated the claim but could not find any evidence of such a promise. He subsequently offered to increase her scholarship for her third and fourth years but not her second year. The player eventually asked for a release from her scholarship so she could transfer to another school.
About two months later, Hofstra officials investigated the plaintiff after the player accused him of sexual harassment. Among the allegations, the player said the plaintiff “had a strange obsession with [her] menstrual cycle” and that he was “inappropriately concerned with the physical appearance and presentation of women on the team.” The plaintiff denied the allegations. But following a meeting with three Hofstra administrators–all women–the university fired the plaintiff for “unprofessional conduct.”
The plaintiff then sued Hofstra for sex discrimination under federal and state law. U.S. District Judge Denis R. Hurley granted Hofstra's motion to dismiss, however, holding that even if the plaintiff's allegations were true–he was fired due to false accusations of sexual harassment–there was no evidence the university's actions were due to his gender. In other words, there was “nothing in the record that would suggest that the circumstances would have been different if Plaintiff had been a woman who had been accused of the same misconduct toward a young student.”
Speak with a New York City Gender Discrimination Lawyer Today
Not every questionable firing violates federal or state civil rights law. If you have faced an adverse employment decision and you believe discrimination played a role, you should speak with a qualified New York employment law attorney right away. Contact the Law Offices of Mahir S. Nisar, Attorney at Law, if you need immediate assistance.